I thought long and hard about what should be the focus of my
first post and decided that it had to be a film. Film has been one of the great
passions in my life. Ever since I saw Disney’s Aladdin in the cinema as a
child, film has captured my imagination and continues to fascinate me. Once
upon a time I studied film critically and had thoughts of entering the film
industry in some capacity. However, I found that I far preferred to simply
watch films and enjoy them for what they are. Therefore, if from time to time
films are the focus of this blog, it will not be in the form of a critique but
simply a discussion. I don’t claim to know what makes a film good or a bad, I’ll
just talk about what I liked.
For my first post I’ve chosen to discuss Ridley Scott’s
latest sci-fi epic Prometheus. I
chose Prometheus for several reasons;
it’s currently the topic of much critical debate, it’s associated with Alien which is one of
my favourite films of all time and it features Michael Fassbender who is currently one of my favourite actors.
Let’s face it, Prometheus
was destined to disappoint to some extent. Any film mentioned in the same
breath as Scott’s seminal sci-fi/horror pic, Alien, is never going to measure up. In my opinion, Alien is one of the most expertly
crafted films in cinema history. Some will argue that Aliens (the sequel to Alien
directed by James Cameron) is the better film but for me Alien wins hands down. From its masterfully claustrophobic
atmosphere to its brilliant character development (Ripley has to be one of the
greatest film heroes of all time), Alien
is a cinema classic whose success will probably never be matched, by prequel or
otherwise. So why compare them? If you get over the fact the Prometheus was never going to be Alien, Prometheus is a fascinating film in its own right.

Prometheus begins with Dr. Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi
Rapace) and her partner Dr. Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) discovering
a series of ancient cave paintings pointing to a distant planet (LV-223) that
they believe holds the truth about the origins of mankind. Shaw and Holloway
lead a crew, including the android David (Michael Fassbender), aboard the
spacecraft Prometheus to explore
LV-223. However, it soon becomes apparent that this mysterious planet is not
what they thought it was.
I used to read as many critical film reviews as I could but
I found it took away a lot of the mysticism of the films I really enjoyed. I
find that critics often get so wrapped up in analysing a film that they forget
to enjoy them. After seeing Prometheus
I allowed myself to seek out quite a few critical reviews, as I was interested
to see how others had interpreted the film. Prometheus
has been received with very mixed reviews and I actually agree with most of them,
the good and the bad. However, I feel that the bad ones have gotten so caught
up in Prometheus’ shortcomings that
they’ve missed its hidden depths, which is where Prometheus really shines.
Many of the negative reviews claim that the problems with Prometheus lie in its script. Largely
this is true; yes it has pacing problems, yes there is little character
development. Many of these reviews also claim there are too many unanswered
questions. They’re right, there are a lot of unanswered questions but that’s
what makes Prometheus so interesting.
We’ve gotten so used to Hollywood films laying out all the answers for us that
we’ve forgotten the joy of looking for answers ourselves. Alien itself was full of unanswered question, which is why it lends
itself to a prequel in the first place.
Alien played upon
the ‘mother’ motif to deliver its unnerving concept of ‘the host’. This motif
was then developed further in Aliens, only to be lost in later sequels. In Prometheus, Scott returns to this original premise but takes
it further. Prometheus explores the
notion of ‘creation’ leading to questions of faith and the human condition. The
title, for example, is not just the name of the ship but refers to the whole idea
of Prometheus. Prometheus was a Titan in Greek mythology who created man from
clay. He also stole fire from the gods and gave it to the humans, enabling the
humans to develop. Prometheus also embodied the quest for scientific
knowledge as well as the risk of overreaching and unintended consequences
(funny they should name the ship after him then). This idea is the main theme
of the film. what happens when your creation is not what you thought it would
be? What happens when your creation turns on you? We see this not only in the Engineers whose own bio-weapons have turned against them, but also in David, mankind’s
creation whose motives become more and more questionable. Not only this, it also becomes apparent in the film that these engineers who created us changed their
minds and planned to destroy us. Why? What was wrong with how we turned out?
In one of the films best pieces of dialogue David
asks Holloway why man created artificial intelligence. Holloway responds ‘we
created you because we could’. David replies coolly, ‘can you imagine how
disappointing it would be to hear that from your own creator?’ This epitomises
the philosophy behind Prometheus; not
all questions have answers, some questions just lead to more questions. Prometheus is full of great moments like
this and, whilst I agree that it’s a shame that these moments aren’t supported
by a sturdier framework, I can’t help but feel that those who were disappointed
with Prometheus where too focused on
getting answers rather than enjoying the search for them. I went to see Prometheus with a group of friends and
after the film was finished we could not stop discussing it. The general
reaction that I’ve gotten from people is that, whilst Prometheus is not without its faults, it is without a doubt
fascinating. From its spectacular cinematography to its grandiose themes and
nagging questions, Prometheus is
nothing if not interesting.

Fassbender delivers another magnetic
performance as Prometheus’ resident android,
David. In a film lacking character development it’s ironic that the most
developed character in the film is in fact a machine. David is played superbly
by Fassbender. He is innately likeable as we watch him taking care of the human
crew during their cryo-sleep and we feel sorry for him when he quietly takes
their underhanded taunts. However, we soon begin to distrust him as he becomes
coolly malevolent, single-mindedly pursuing his own answers. Fassbender doesn’t
miss a beat. He delivers more of the ominous brooding he delivered in Shame and X-men: first-class mixed with the sly wit he displayed in Inglorious Bassterds. This combination
proves to be one of the most intriguing characters I’ve come across in a cinema
since Heath Ledger smudged his lipstick. Fassbender has quickly become my
favourite actor currently gracing our screens and from what he’s shown us so
far I think we can expect great things.
Rapace too offers a fine performance. However this doesn’t
really show through until about half way through the film when her character is
thrown into some tricky situations. Rapace particularly shines in what is easily the films best scene involving some … aah, ‘gut wrenching’ surgery.
Rapace shows just how underutilised she was in the mediocre summer popcorn
flick Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows.
Rapace too is another actor from whom I think we can expect to see good things.

If I had my way, there would been no sequels to Alien and it would have been left to
stand on its own as the great work of cinema that it is. The Alien franchise took a steep decline
after Aliens, firstly with the
troubled Alien3 and ultimately
resulting in the downright shameful Aliens
vs. Predator: Requiem (I’m loath to even mention it as I don’t really
consider Alien vs. Predator to even
be part of the Alien franchise).
Considering the trajectory that the Alien
sequels took after Aliens, I think
any addition to this franchise that may return some of its credibility is
welcome. If nothing else, I respect Scott for what he has attempted to do with
this film. Scott watched as one of his earliest and most acclaimed works of art
was degraded time and time again by underwhelming sequels. What Scott has done
with Prometheus is say ‘I’m taking
back my creation and I’m going to at least attempt to restore some of its
former glory’, and I commend him for that.
It seems to be a trend of late to take cherished franchises
and attempt to reboot them (undoubtably due to the guaranteed returns they
generate despite the actual quality of the films). I found that generally with these
films you leave thinking ‘should’ve left well enough alone’ (e.g. Indiana Jones and the kingdom of the Crystal
skull). However I don’t believe Prometheus
is in the same vien. Prometheus isn’t
a sequel; it’s not even really a prequel. Prometheus
is an entirely new story that simply takes place in the same universe as Alien and this allows the film to go in
entirely new directions. It’s not the masterpiece many where hoping for but if
you let go of all those expectations and go into Prometheus with an opened mind you’ll leave with plenty to think
about.